Nancy Pelosi had two options in deciding whether to become a member of the House of Representatives meeting next week to investigate the January 6 attack on the US Capitol.
She was able to accept five appointees made by minority Republican leader Kevin McCarthy on Monday, ensuring skeptics who had a genuine motive for Democrats to hold hearings. I was able to. Alternatively, she could do politically wisely to exclude enemy Jim Jordan and others from the panel and give Democrats a platform for malicious conservatives.
Not surprisingly, she chose politics over honesty.
Pelosi then frankly insisted on her decision to refuse the appointment of Jordan and Indiana Congressman Jim Banks, noting that both Jordan and Banks were frank allies of former President Donald Trump. , Ensuring the “integrity” of the survey.
Ironically, Pelosi said the commission was created to “investigate and report the facts and causes of the attack” and “will find the truth that the Republicans are clearly afraid of.”
But by doing so, I think it would be better to ask questions from both sides.
And who is afraid of who?
Since Jordan was elected Monday night, Democrats have urged Pelosi to take him away. They note that lawmakers defended Trump in both the impeachment process. Jordan and the bank were also one of the 139 House Republicans who voted to overturn the election results.
Pelosi has long been plagued by Jordan’s attack dog attitude at previous parliamentary hearings. The two often sparred.
But if the Democrats were serious about pursuing the “truth” at these hearings, they wouldn’t have put two dissenting lawmakers on the bench.
Tit for tat is now complete.
McCarthy said the Republicans wouldn’t participate in the investigation if the Democrats didn’t accept the members he appointed.
The Democratic Party said an investigation would be conducted to see if Republicans would participate. Pelosi has already appointed eight of the thirteen members, including Republican Rep. Liz Cheney, according to Commission rules. ..
The hearing may continue, but the panel has lost all legitimacy due to Pelosi’s actions.
There is no doubt about it.
Editorial: Pelosi again chooses politics over honesty
Source link Editorial: Pelosi again chooses politics over honesty