US Congressman Jim Jordan, R-Urbana, is known to be a straightforward, pro-Trump Republican with strong support for his GOP base. Except for his stance of regulating Big Tech.
They hate it.
According to a new survey in the Fourth Parliamentary District of Ohioz, 81% of voters fear that executives from major tech companies such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon are over-powered, and 87% are federal governments. Hopes to work harder to curb abuse by big tech companies.
Meanwhile, according to Gallup, 57% of voters across the country believe that the government should tighten regulations on tech companies.
A bipartisan parliamentary group has proposed the American Innovation and Choice Online Act. The AICO Act, which introduces new rules and standards for leading technology companies, is sponsored by Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar and Senator Chuck Glasle of Iowa in the US Senate.
The Senate Judiciary Committee cast 16-6 votes last month to promote the AICO Act, with five Republicans joining the Democratic Party and voting in favor.
The house version, endorsed by Congressman David Siciline (DR.I.) and Ken Bach (R-Colorado), is already off the committee and ready to vote.
The AICO Act prevents Big Tech platforms (with at least 50 million monthly active U.S. users) from giving unfair priority to their products and services over other companies using the platform. I am aiming for it. It also prohibits large companies like Amazon and Google from unreasonably limiting the ability of other companies to compete on the platform.
The problem split the Republican Party. Some Republicans, such as Jordan, Cathy McMorris Rogers, and R-Wash, say they are afraid of new regulations that will result in Big Tech partnering with big government. They want to leave the tech giants largely unregulated.
“Today we have a bill where Big Tech and Big Media aren’t working together, but Big Tech and big government are now married and working together,” Jordan said in a parliamentary debate last year. I said in.
But another frank, pro-Trump Republican Senator John Kennedy has a different view.
“Big Tech has a track record of unreasonably limiting consumer choices and blocking free market competition. The American Innovation and Choice Online Act gives consumers more options from online businesses at competitive prices. This helps the American economy to do its best, “he said.
Some tech experts have told Inside Sources that antitrust laws and surveillance rules are urgently needed to prevent Big Tech from abusing its power.
Eleanor Fox, a professor of trade regulation at NYU School of Law, said antitrust laws in the United States are outdated compared to the rest of the world, even if high-tech companies become more powerful.
“If our antitrust deficit had been eliminated, it would have been better if it had been the other way around,” she insisted. “American innovation and online law of choice is fragmented, but better than nothing. At least, it makes the United States the rest of the world in admitting that there are these gatekeeper platforms that gatekeepers suppress. It will be more in line with the region. Rivalry. “
“Basically, gatekeepers say they can’t control a company’s competition when it competes on the platform,” she said.
Jordan has announced some of its own Big Tech regulatory proposals, including amendments to Section 230. But such technical suggestions may be too few for Americans who are increasingly eager to hunt down Silicon Valley’s biggest players.
“Voters, especially Republican voters, are increasingly demanding action from Congress to curb the power of Big Tech,” says John John Schwep of the American Principles Project. “This, of course, puts Republican politicians who were friendly with big tech companies in the past in a difficult place, but voters aren’t content with false behavior — they want results.
“A monopoly that acts illegally and anti-competitively, such as by unfairly prioritizing its products and services, distorts the free market and prevents new entrants from innovating and competing. It only works if you act according to the rules, “added Schweppe.
Jordan’s office did not respond to requests for comment.
Peter Cartessen, an emeritus professor of antitrust law and competition policy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said the challenges presented by Big Tech must be resolved by parliament, not by court.
“The question of policy is now how best to deal with the concentrated market and the consequent dominance of these companies,” he said. “There are more reasons to look at legislative amendments because of the way courts, especially the Supreme Court, interpreted antitrust law.”
Polls show which side American consumers are in the fight. But, as Carstensen points out, “Law production, like sausage production, is not for sensitive people.”
Michael Graham is a political editor at InsideSources.com. His column does not necessarily reflect the views of the Lima News Editorial Board or the newspaper owner AIM Media.
Michael Graham: Jordan on the other side of the Big Tech battle, polls show
Source link Michael Graham: Jordan on the other side of the Big Tech battle, polls show