Ohio Supreme Court rejects Republican-made parliamentary map

Columbus, Ohio — A map of the Republican Parliament in Ohio was dismissed by the State High Court on Friday, unfairly providing Republicans with some potentially competitive seats in this year’s important midterm elections. It gave hope to the Democrats who claimed to have done so.

In a four-to-three ruling, the Ohio Supreme Court returned the map to the Republican-dominated Ohio Legislature, and then to the powerful Ohio Constituency Change Commission. The two agencies have a total of 60 days to draw a new line in compliance with the 2018 Constitutional Amendment to Gerrymandering.

The commission is already in the process of reconstructing the Republican legislative map so that it can be redrawn, and the court dismissed it as a gerrymander this week. The decision allowed the panel to comply for 10 days.

February 2 and March 4 are approaching submission dates for legislative and parliamentary candidates, respectively, and this decision raises the question of whether the state’s May 3 primary association needs to be extended. It happened.

Ohio Republican Chairman Bob Paduchik called the situation confusing and criticized the Ohio Supreme Court for giving a committee within two weeks to create a new legislative map.

“It’s hard to dump to the committee in a very short period of time,” he said at a forum at the Cleveland City Club on Friday. “It’s hard to say what will happen.”

The judge blamed Republicans for both the voter’s wishes and the decision to ignore the Constitution and instructed them to move in a hurry.

Judge Michael Donnelly said in favor of the majority, “evidence in these cases undoubtedly reveals that the General Assembly did not listen to statements from Ohio voters calling for the suspension of political gerrymandering. I have. “

Donnelly and two other Democrats in the court have joined Judge Maureen O’Conner, a moderate Republican who will leave the court due to age restrictions at the end of the year.

Three other Republicans in the court, including Judge Pat DeWine, the son of Republican Governor Mike DeWine, were nominated as plaintiffs in the proceedings, but opposed.

They said it was unclear how the map should be determined to “over-support” one party over the other.

“If we say that the majority are unfairly supporting the Republican Party, it means that the plan is unfairly supporting the Republican Party compared to the results obtained if we follow the proportional representation system.” Opinion stated.

They explained that the United States had never adopted a system that required proportional distribution of parliamentary seats to match the popularity poll, and the Ohio Constitution did not.

In her other opinion, Mr. O’Connor said that voting rights and democratic groups that disagree with the map never argued that a strict proportional relationship was needed.

“The negative characterization of the dissent of all the metrics used by the complainant’s expert, simply as a measure of’proportional representation’, is a sleight of hand,” she writes. “The magician’s trick can’t hide what the evidence overwhelmingly shows. The map statistically shows the partisan advantage that over-supports the Republican Party.”

Friday’s decision will affect the legal department of the National Democratic Constituency Change Commission and the individual lawsuits filed by the Women’s Voter Federation and the Ohio Office of the A. Philiplandolph Institute. The group calculated that either 12 or 13 of the 15 districts on the map would support the Republican Party, even though the GOP won only about 54% of the votes in the last decade of state-wide races. ..

The Republicans defended the map, which had been rushed through the approval process, as fair and constitutional “very competitive.”

Election defenders and Democrats praised the court’s decision, the second victory of the week.

“The operation of the district is an election operation, and voters have enough,” said plaintiff Catherine Tarsar, executive director of Common Causes, Ohio. “We expect legislative leaders to learn from their mistakes and ultimately listen to people’s calls for a fair map.”

Ohio and other states needed to redraw the map of Congress to reflect the results of the 2020 census. Under that, Ohio lost one of its current 16 districts due to population lag.

Members of the Ohio Senate Government Oversight Committee will hear testimony on November 16, 2021 about a new map of the state legislature district at the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus, Ohio. On Friday, January 14, 2022, the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed a new map of the state’s 15 parliamentary districts as a gerrymander and sent back a blueprint for another attempt. The 4-3 decision returns the process to a strong Ohio subdivision committee.

Ohio Supreme Court rejects Republican-made parliamentary map

Source link Ohio Supreme Court rejects Republican-made parliamentary map

Related Articles

Back to top button