Researchers at the University of Notre Dame have tested more than 230 commonly used cosmetics and found that they contain significant amounts of high levels of fluoride.
More than half of the cosmetics sold in the United States and Canada may contain high levels of toxic industrial compounds associated with serious health conditions such as cancer and weight loss at birth, according to a new study. There is sex.
Researchers at Notre Dame University have tested over 230 commonly used cosmetics, with 56% of foundation and eye products, 48% of lip products, and 47% of mascara containing high levels of fluoride. I found that. An “eternal chemical” used in non-stick frying pans, rugs and countless other consumer products.
According to a study published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology Letters on Tuesday, some of the highest PFAS levels were found in waterproof mascara (82%) and long-lasting lipstick (62%). Twenty-nine products with high fluoride levels were further tested and found to contain 4 to 13 specific PFAS chemicals. Only one item has PFAS listed as an ingredient on the label.
The findings were published when a bipartisan senator group submitted a bill banning the use of PFAS, or perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in cosmetics and other cosmetological products. The move to ban PFAS is a broad legislation for Congress to set national drinking water standards for certain PFAS chemicals and to cleanse contaminated areas across the country, including military bases where high rates of PFAS were found. It happens when you consider.
The Environmental Protection Agency is also working to collect industry data on the use and health risks of PFAS chemicals as it is considering regulations to reduce the potential risks posed by chemicals.
“There is nothing safe or good in PFAS,” said Senator Richard Blumenthal, who submitted a cosmetics bill to Republican Senator Susan Collins. People literally display it on their faces every day. “
Congressman Debbie Dingell, who sponsors several PFAS-related bills in the House of Representatives, searched for PFAS in his cosmetics and lipstick, but the products weren’t properly labeled, so whether they existed or not. He said he could not confirm. ..
“How can I find out that there is no PFAS?” She asked at a press conference on Tuesday about the eye makeup, foundation and lipstick she was wearing. “People are addicted every day.”
Graham Peesley, a professor of physics at Notre Dame and a principal investigator in the study, called the results shocking. Not only does cosmetics pose an imminent risk to users, he said, but it also creates long-term risks. “PFAS is a persistent chemical. Once in the bloodstream, it stays and accumulates,” says Peesley.
Chemicals also pose a risk of environmental pollution associated with manufacturing and disposal, he said.
“This should be a wake-up call for the cosmetics industry,” said David Andrews, senior scientist at the Environmental Working Group, a Washington-based nonprofit organization that has been working on PFAS restrictions.
The products tested in this study are “applied daily by millions of Americans. It is important to end all non-essential uses of PFAS,” Andrews said.
Artificial compounds, along with fire extinguishing foam, are used in countless products such as non-stick cookware, water repellent sporting goods, cosmetics and grease resistant food packaging.
Public health studies on exposed populations have linked chemicals to a range of health problems, including some cancers, weakened immunity, and low birth weight. Extensive testing in recent years has detected high levels of PFAS in many public water systems and military bases.
“PFAS chemicals are not required for makeup and should not be used in personal care products as they are likely to cause harm,” said Arlene, co-author of the study and secretary general of the Green Science Policy Institute. Bloom says. , An advocacy group in Berkeley, California.
A spokeswoman for the US Food and Drug Administration, which regulates cosmetics, did not make immediate comments.
The Personal Care Product Council, a leading industry association in the cosmetics industry, said in a statement that products such as lotions, nail polishes, eye makeup and foundations may contain trace amounts of PFAS chemicals. Said there is. Chemicals are used for product consistency and texture and are subject to FDA safety requirements, said Alexandra Kowcz, Chief Scientist of the Council.
“Our member companies are responsible for product safety and the trust family takes those products very seriously,” she said, and the group upheld a ban on certain PFAS cosmetics. I added that. Do. ”
Former Prosecutor General Blumenthal, a self-proclaimed “crusade” on behalf of consumers, said he did not use cosmetics. But on behalf of millions of cosmetic users, he said he was sending a message to the industry. “We trusted you and you betrayed us.”
Brands that want to avoid the possibility of government regulation should voluntarily avoid using PFAS, according to Blumental. “Conscious and angry consumers most effectively support change.”
Research: Half of US cosmetics contain toxic chemicals
Source link Research: Half of US cosmetics contain toxic chemicals