The movie exposes the controversy behind the construction of the 9/11 museum

New York — The new film reveals and updates the tensions that led to the creation of the September 11 Museum under the World Trade Center Memorial Waterfall and Reflective Pool.

Unfortunate museum officials opposed the documentary “Outsider,” which unveiled the conflicting visions behind the New York landmark that opened in 2014, and called for changes.

The movie will be released on Thursday through Facebook, a rare place, and will be streamed to users for $ 3.99. It will then be available in some theaters and other streaming services for the 20th anniversary of the attack.

The “outsider” was Michael Schran, a former creative director of the museum, and was often in conflict with current president and CEO Alice Green Wald and his associates. The two have worked on the development for several years and have come to have a fundamental difference in how the story should be presented.

In essence, Schran felt that the museum should be more welcome and better deal with what led to the attack and its aftermath: the war in Afghanistan and Iraq and the restrictions on personal freedom in the United States. felt. To the horror of the day.

“Michael wanted to raise a question,” says narrator Bob Garfield in the film. “Alice wanted to provide an answer.”

The couple’s filmmakers Steven Rosenbaum and Pamela Yoda have a unique history of recording September 11, 2001. Their company was filming an Animal Planet show in Manhattan that day, but pivoted after the plane crashed. Rosenbaum told his crew to film what was happening on the street. The material and other crowdsourcing videos were used in the 2002 movie “September 7 Days”.

In 2008, they granted the museum the right to use what they needed for the 500-hour video collected that week. In return, they were offered behind-the-scenes access to the museum’s work, believing that they could make interesting films in their own right.

“It was intended to be an observational documentary,” Rosenbaum said. “For the first two years, the museum was what we were told to do.”

Schran, who is not part of the world of museums and curation, was hired for his work after opening a photo gallery of his works from 9/11. He was an outsider. He was dissatisfied with the experts in those museums, and obviously they were with him.

The filmmakers sided with the controversy and said they didn’t like what happened to the museum.

“It’s nationalist, warlike, and based on complaints,” Rosenbaum said. “If you go, you’ll be sad and angry. Is that what the museum should do?”

Schran refused to comment on the film, except that he was unaware that he was focusing on him until the film was completed. As usual, he left the museum after it opened.

A museum spokeswoman, Lee Cochran, said the “outsider” “looks at the facility through a lens of a particular idealism that we do not share.”

“Now that so many institutions in the United States are subject to ideological and partisan division, Memorial & Museum must remain a sacred place for education and unity,” Cochrane said. “We have revealed to filmmakers that we are disappointed with many of their decisions that we consider to be rude to the victims and their families.”

The museum argued that focusing on how 9/11 changed America would become obsolete as soon as the museum opened.

Museum staff have the right to review the film, primarily on security issues, and screened it in May. A few weeks later, the lawyer sent the filmmaker a long list of complaints.

Most are ignored and some seem trivial. Officials argued, for example, that the scene showing exchanges for items that could be sold at the museum’s gift shop was defamatory. They said that including the staff’s off-hand comment that “fruits are much healthier than donuts” would damage the person’s reputation.

They are also reviewing disastrous audio tapes that museum officials are talking to emergency operators when they notice a woman at the World Trade Center is dying, as well as victims jumping or dying. I opposed the video showing how it was slacking.

The museum said it would be unnecessarily difficult to see these scenes, as both were rejected due to possible exhibits. The filmmaker said he wanted to explain the types of difficult decisions faced by creative directors and curators.

Moreover, they said that editorial choices were their privilege, not the museum’s.

After publicizing their objections, the museum said it was not pursuing them anymore and was not trying to stop the distribution of the film.

The flowers will be placed in the inscribed name of the deceased at the 9/11 Memorial Museum in New York on September 11, 2020. Museum officials opposed and called for changes to the documentary “Outsider,” which will be released this week, revealing the controversy involved in the development of the museum and the museum on September 11, 2014. rice field.

The movie exposes the controversy behind the construction of the 9/11 museum

Source link The movie exposes the controversy behind the construction of the 9/11 museum

Related Articles

Back to top button